AI Vendors
Close Enterprise AI Deals Faster
The continuous AI monitoring layer your enterprise buyers ask for. Ship the seal. Clear the gate. Close the deal.
Deals stall at security review when enterprise procurement asks AI-governance questions your SOC 2 report does not cover. RAIDS closes that gap with a three-step path: assessment, seal, and continuous monitoring evidence. Book a 20-minute call to find out exactly where your deals are stalling and whether RAIDS closes the gap.
Active
- VendorAcme AI Inc.
- SealISO 42001 Clauses Monitored by RAIDS
- Monitoring scopeOperational-monitoring, audit-trail, and third-party-monitoring clauses (ISO 42001 A.6.2.4, A.6.2.6, and A.6.2.8)
- StatusActive on all clauses in the monitoring scope
- Last assessmentActive (Live telemetry)
- Independent assurancePrescient (Audit pathway)
- Revocation criteriaDocumented; auto-revoke on drift
What your enterprise buyer sees when they click your seal.
Three Ways Enterprise AI Deals Stall
The SOC 2 Gap
The deal reaches security review. The customer security team asks for AI governance evidence. The standard SOC 2 report does not cover it. The deal slips a quarter, sometimes two.
The Questionnaire Dead End
The security questionnaire asks for AI-governance evidence your SOC 2 report does not provide. SOC 2 attests to your internal controls. It does not attest to how your AI products behave in the customer's environment.
The DPA Delay
AI-specific clauses land in the custom DPA. Legal review opens. The deal waits.
All three have the same root cause and the same answer.
One Seal. Three Steps.
Assess
Gap report against ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act high-risk controls. Written procurement-readiness report. Delivered in two weeks.
Issue
The RAIDS monitoring seal plus the verification page. Criteria, expiration date, and revocation rules visible to anyone your buyer shares it with.
Maintain
Continuous monitoring evidence flowing to your trust page. The seal refreshes when controls are satisfied. It revokes when they are not.
Not a Badge. An Attestation.
A seal only creates trust if your buyer can verify it. The RAIDS seal is tied to a recognised framework, links to a public verification page with criteria, expiration date, and revocation rules, and is backed by Prescient Security as an independent assurance partner. That is what separates an attestation from a badge.
Seal Variants
ISO 42001 Clauses
Monitored by RAIDS AI
Operational-monitoring, audit-trail, and third-party-monitoring clauses (A.6.2.4, A.6.2.6, and A.6.2.8). Full coverage on 3 clauses and partial coverage on 12.
NIST AI RMF Controls
Monitored by RAIDS AI
MEASURE and MANAGE functions. Does not cover GOVERN or MAP.
EU AI Act Monitoring
Evidence by RAIDS AI
Post-market monitoring, incident reporting, record-keeping, and Article 72 (Articles 17(h), 17(i), 17(k)). RAIDS supplies the monitoring evidence; the compliance obligation remains with the system owner.
prEN 18286 Controls (draft)
Monitored by RAIDS AI
Performance-evaluation and operational-monitoring clauses. Standard not yet finalized; released 30 October 2025.
RAIDS verifies continuous monitoring against named controls. It is not a certification of full framework compliance.
Two Stages. No Lock-In.
Every question we hear on the first call.
Enterprise AI governance is new enough that most vendors hit the same walls in the same order. Here are the questions that come up on every first call.
Your buyers' security teams are already asking AI-governance questions. The gate is not formal certification. It is the evidence your procurement contact needs to get a yes from their security team. We help you answer those questions today, with or without a hard regulatory deadline.
SOC 2 attests to your internal controls. It does not attest to how your AI products behave in a customer's environment. That is what the security team is escalating on. RAIDS fills that gap without replacing your SOC 2.
You can. The question is whether your engineering team should be on the critical path for your sales cycle or building product. The assessment takes two weeks. An internal equivalent takes longer and does not come with an independent assurance partner.
The monitoring layer is model-agnostic. The seal refreshes automatically when controls remain satisfied and revokes when they do not. A model change triggers a re-evaluation, not a restart.
Stage one is a fixed-price, two-week deliverable. Stage two is month to month. No annual lock. If the seal does not move your deals, you stop. Nothing is tied to a long-term contract.
A gap report against ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act high-risk controls relevant to your product. A written procurement-readiness report you can share internally or with aprospect. Delivered in two weeks.
Two weeks from assessment kick-off to seal issuance. The verification page goes live the day the seal isissued.
Drata handles your SOC 2 evidence pipeline. RAIDS monitors your AI product behaviour and generates the AI-governance evidence layer your SOC 2 does not produce. The two sync. Drata-compatible evidence flows from RAIDS into your existing trust infrastructure.
Find out where your deals are stalling.
Book a 20-minute procurement gap review. We will map which AI-governance questions are blocking your pipeline and whether RAIDS closes the gap.